1998 Amendment A
                                
                                
                                1998 Ballot 
			Question Pamphlet
			Compiled by the Office of Secretary of State Joyce Hazeltine
			
			SDCL 12-13-23 requires the Office of the 
			Secretary of State to prepare and distribute public information 
			concerning constitutional amendments, initiatives and referred 
			measures. This pamphlet is prepared by soliciting statements from 
			the proponents and opponents of amendments and measures.
			
			The title, explanation and effect of a vote for each ballot question 
			were provided by the Attorney General. No other statements on this 
			pamphlet reflect the opinion of the State or the Attorney General.
			
			The information was compiled by the Secretary of State as supplied 
			by the writers, was not verified by the Secretary of State and does 
			not reflect the position of the State regarding the legality or 
			effect of the amendments or measures. The Secretary of State does 
			not guarantee the accuracy of any claims made by the proponent or 
			opponent writers in this brochure.
            
            
            
Constitutional Amendment A
			Title: Initiated amendment to 
			Article VIII, Section 15 of the South Dakota Constitution concerning 
			the taxation of real property for school purposes.
            
            Attorney General Explanation
			       School districts have a constitutional 
			right to use real property taxes to pay their expenses. On average, 
			about half of school funding comes from property taxes. If property 
			taxes are removed as a source of revenue for schools, the 
			Constitution requires that the Legislature find some other method of 
			funding public schools.
			        Amendment A would not eliminate property 
			taxes, but would prohibit using such taxes for public schools.
			        Amendment A contains no effective date. If 
			it is effective immediately, and the Legislature does not meet and 
			find an immediate alternative revenue source, then contract rights 
			may be violated. Property taxes for payment of existing school bonds 
			will probably not be affected.
			      Amendment A may conflict with Amendment F. 
			If both constitutional amendments pass and are found to conflict 
			with each other, one or both could be declared void.
			     A vote "Yes" will prohibit the use of 
			property taxes to fund public schools.
			     A vote "No" will leave the Constitution as it 
			is.
            
            
            Pro -- Constitutional Amendment A
			
			Since 1972 SD taxpayers have complained about the tax system in 
			their state. Several initiated measures have been submitted to the 
			voters, but all have failed because of heavy resistance from the 
			Executive Branch, the Legislature and special interest groups. 
			Consequently, South Dakota is still in dire need of tax reform!
			
			Several studies have confirmed the inequities and problems with our 
			tax system. A 1989-90 study, ordered by Gov. Michelson, found that 
			(1) property taxes are high, (2) property tax assessments are 
			unequal and unfair, (3) current tax sources are inequitable. The 
			findings and recommendations of this study were largely ignored. 
			Another study of the property tax problem is now being conducted 
			because of rapidly rising property assessments and tax bills.
			
			Amendment A is designed to "jump start" tax reform by changing the 
			way education is funded. Currently approximately 62% of property tax 
			revenue is earmarked for Kindergarten-12 grade education. This heavy 
			reliance on property taxes has caused huge increases in property tax 
			bills to meet increased costs of education for the past 2 1/2 
			decades. And in spite of these increases, education is still not 
			properly funded; school are in disrepair, teachers receive the 
			lowest average salaries in the nation, and bond issues for buildings 
			or repairs are being voted down in many school districts.
			
			Under section 15, Article VIII of the Constitution, the 
			Legislature has responsibility for funding education by "general 
			taxation" and therefore should initiate tax reform. An offer to 
			withdraw this initiative from the ballot was made to the last 
			Legislative session if serious tax reform was introduced and put to 
			a vote of the people. This offer was ignored and the Legislature 
			will not enact tax reform until required to do so by a vote of the 
			people.
			
			The taxpayers of SD need Legislative action on real tax 
			reform; not more studies of a known problem.
			
			VOTE "YES" ON AMENDMENT A
			
			Submitted by: David D. Ruff, 3040 Ridge Road, Spearfish, SD 57783. 
			Mr. Ruff is one of the sponsors of this initiative.
            
            
            Con -- Constitutional Amendment A
			
			Amendment A is an 11-word sentence that would create major problems 
			for South Dakota’s kids and our quality of education will suffer.
			
			1. LOSS OF LOCAL CONTROL
			If passed, virtually every dollar used to fund South Dakota’s 
			public schools will come from either the state or federal 
			government, and policy makers in Pierre and Washington, DC will 
			decide the revenue side of every school district’s budget. This will 
			lead to fewer opportunities for our young people at a time when they 
			need more communication, problem-solving and mathematical skills 
			than ever before.
			
			2. PROPERTY TAXES WOULD NOT GO AWAY
			Currently, local school districts receive an average of 62 
			percent of property taxes paid; cities, counties and special 
			districts receive the rest. Even if Amendment A were to pass, 
			property tax payers would still be paying a tax bill that would be 
			nearly 40 percent of its current total.
			
			3. TAX CHAOS WILL RESULT
			If passed, Amendment A would go into effect the day after the 
			state election canvass in December, 1998. Calculating taxes owed 
			would be chaotic, and potential lawsuits would tie up this question 
			in the courts for months or years.
			
			4. LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL OF ALL SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
			School bonds have been let under terms that they be repaid by 
			local property taxes. If property taxes are no longer available for 
			school purposes, serious questions will arise about how current 
			bonds will be repaid.
			
			And since no local property taxes could be used to let bonds for 
			future construction projects, school districts would have to get 
			funding approval for each new construction project from the state 
			Legislature.
			
			5. LOSS OF FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS
			Most federal school aid programs require local matching funds, 
			so there is a distinct possibility that some local programs will be 
			pared back or cut entirely. This could affect a variety of services 
			including special education and school lunch programs.
			
			Amendment A deserves an "F." Vote NO on A.
			Submitted by: Ray Trankle, Taxpayers 
			for Education and Common Sense, PO Box 1214, Pierre, SD 57501-1214.